Home / Electrical Engineering / Renewable Energy & Efficiency / SEER to EER Conversion (Air Conditioner Efficiency)

Formula & Calculator

SEER to EER Conversion (Air Conditioner Efficiency)

SEER measures air conditioner efficiency over a whole season, while EER measures it at a single peak temperature. This tool converts between them. The simple formula multiplies SEER by 0.875, but a more accurate quadratic formula is also provided. It helps compare AC units and estimate performance under peak conditions.

SEER to EER Air Conditioner Efficiency Energy Efficiency Ratio Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio HVAC Calculator Cooling Efficiency AC Performance Energy Savings
VORZEP · AIR CONDITIONER EFFICIENCY · AHRI STANDARDS

SEER to EER Conversion Calculator

Convert between Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) and Energy Efficiency Ratio (EER) using either the quick approximate formula or the more accurate quadratic fit.

Approx. EER = SEER × 0.875
Precise EER = −0.02×SEER² + 1.12×SEER − 0.5
Conversion formula
Solve for
SEER Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio — cooling output over a typical season divided by total electrical energy used, in Btu/Wh.
SEER
Enter a valid SEER value (typically 8–30).
EER Energy Efficiency Ratio — cooling output at one fixed test condition (95°F outdoor) divided by power draw, in Btu/Wh. SOLVED
EER
Enter a valid EER value (typically 5–25).
EER
14.00Btu/Wh
COP ≈ 4.10
EER = SEER × 0.875
Step-by-step solution
Compare both formulas
Sensitivity
Why SEER and EER aren't the same
SEERseasonal average
≠
EERfixed 95°F test

SEER

Measured over a full simulated cooling season with varying outdoor temperatures, so it reflects part-load performance and cycling efficiency.

EER

Measured at one fixed, hot outdoor condition (95°F / 35°C), so it reflects worst-case, full-load efficiency rather than a seasonal average.

Why the ratio isn't fixed

The 0.875 factor is a rough average; the true relationship is curved because higher-SEER systems gain efficiency disproportionately at part load versus full load — hence the quadratic "precise" formula.

Manufacturer data wins

Both formulas are estimates. For rebates, code compliance, or purchasing decisions, always use the EER/SEER figures on the equipment's AHRI certificate.

How to Use This Calculator

  1. Pick a formula — Approximate for a quick estimate, or Precise for the quadratic fit that tracks real ratings more closely.
  2. Choose what to solve for — EER from a known SEER, or SEER from a known EER.
  3. Enter the known value, or tap one of the common SEER chips (13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 26) to load a typical rating.
  4. Read the result in the panel on the right, along with the equation used.
  5. Switch to Advanced mode to compare both formulas side by side and see how sensitive the result is to small changes in SEER.

What This Tool Offers

  • Two formulas — a quick linear approximation and a more accurate quadratic fit, your choice.
  • Two-way solving — go from SEER to EER or from EER back to SEER, including the quadratic's inverse.
  • Common rating shortcuts — one-tap chips for typical residential SEER tiers.
  • Step-by-step math so you can verify or show your work, not just read a final number.
  • Advanced diagnostics — a side-by-side comparison of both formulas plus local sensitivity of EER to SEER.

What Are SEER and EER?

SEER (Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio) and EER (Energy Efficiency Ratio) both measure how much cooling an air conditioner delivers per unit of electricity, in Btu per watt-hour. SEER is a seasonal average calculated across a range of outdoor temperatures and part-load conditions, while EER is measured at a single fixed, high-load condition (95°F outdoor, per AHRI/DOE test standards). Because they're measured differently, a system's SEER and EER numbers are never identical, even though a higher rating always means better efficiency in both.

SEER to EER Conversion Formulas

Two common approximations are used to estimate one rating from the other when only one is published:

Approximate: EER = SEER × 0.875
Precise: EER = −0.02×SEER² + 1.12×SEER − 0.5

The approximate formula assumes a fixed ratio between the two ratings. The precise (quadratic) formula better reflects how the SEER/EER relationship curves at higher efficiency levels, where the ratio between them tends to shift.

How to Convert SEER to EER

Select "EER" as the unknown, choose a formula, enter the SEER rating (from the equipment's spec sheet or AHRI certificate), and the calculator solves it directly. To go the other way — for example, to check what SEER a listed EER roughly implies — switch the unknown to "SEER."

FormulaSolve for EERSolve for SEER
ApproximateEER = SEER × 0.875SEER = EER ÷ 0.875
PreciseEER = −0.02·SEER² + 1.12·SEER − 0.5Quadratic formula, solved for SEER

SEER / EER Variables

SymbolMeaningTypical range
SEERSeasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio13–26+ (residential)
EEREnergy Efficiency Ratio at a fixed 95°F test condition8–17 (residential)

Quick Reference: Common SEER-to-EER Conversions

Most residential systems fall in the SEER 13–26 range. Here's how both formulas compare across that range, along with the equivalent COP (Coefficient of Performance):

SEEREER (Approx.)EER (Precise)COP (from Precise)
1311.3810.683.13
1412.2511.263.30
1513.1311.803.46
1614.0012.303.60
1714.8812.763.74
1815.7513.183.86
1916.6313.563.97
2017.5013.904.07
2118.3814.204.16
2219.2514.464.24
2421.0014.864.35
2521.8815.004.40
2622.7515.104.43

Below about SEER 20, the two formulas stay close; above that, they diverge more, since the Precise (quadratic) curve flattens while the Approximate formula keeps scaling linearly. The Precise formula peaks near SEER 28 — treat results at or above that point with caution, since real equipment doesn't behave that way.

SEER to EER Example

Given: SEER = 16 (Approximate formula)
EER = 16 × 0.875
EER = 14.00
Given: SEER = 16 (Precise formula)
EER = −0.02×16² + 1.12×16 − 0.5
EER = −5.12 + 17.92 − 0.5
EER = 12.30

Frequently Asked Questions

SEER and EER are measured under different test conditions, so the true relationship between them depends on a specific unit's design, refrigerant, and part-load behavior. Both formulas here are estimates, not physical laws.

The quadratic "precise" formula generally tracks published ratings more closely across a wider SEER range, but for any real purchasing or compliance decision, use the manufacturer's AHRI-certified EER and SEER values instead of either estimate.

They measure different things — SEER reflects seasonal, part-load performance, while EER reflects hot-day, full-load performance. In very hot climates, EER is often given extra weight since the unit spends more time near that test condition.

COP (Coefficient of Performance) is the same efficiency concept expressed in consistent energy units instead of Btu/Wh. COP = EER ÷ 3.412, since 1 watt-hour equals about 3.412 Btu.

Calculating...

Variables

Symbol Quantity Unit
SEER Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio Btu/Wh
EER Energy Efficiency Ratio Btu/Wh
Conversion Factor Approximate multiplier 0.875 (linear) or quadratic formula

What it means

SEER and EER are both measures of air conditioner efficiency, but they are calculated under different conditions. SEER is an average over an entire cooling season, accounting for varying outdoor temperatures. EER is a single-point measurement at a high outdoor temperature (35°C). Because of this, SEER values are typically higher than EER values for the same unit. The conversion between them helps you understand how your air conditioner will perform on the hottest days of the year. This calculator gives you two conversion methods: a simple linear rule of thumb and a more accurate quadratic formula based on industry data. The linear method is quick and easy, while the quadratic method better reflects real-world performance for modern high-SEER units. Use this tool to make better comparisons and decisions for your cooling needs.

Worked example

Example 1 – Mid‑Efficiency AC (SEER 16)

Real‑World
Scenario: A homeowner is comparing a new air conditioner with a SEER rating of 16. They want to know the EER at peak load (35°C) to estimate performance during the hottest days. Using the quadratic formula, they calculate the precise EER.
ParameterValue
SEER16.0
Conversion MethodQuadratic (Precise)
FormulaEER = −0.02·SEER² + 1.12·SEER − 0.5
1EER = −0.02 × (16)² + 1.12 × 16 − 0.5
2= −0.02 × 256 + 17.92 − 0.5
3= −5.12 + 17.92 − 0.5 = 12.30
Result12.3✓ EER = 12.3 (Good)

Example 2 – High‑Efficiency AC (SEER 22)

Premium
Scenario: A commercial building manager is considering a high‑end system with a SEER of 22. They need the EER at peak conditions to ensure it meets energy‑saving targets. Both linear and quadratic methods are compared.
ParameterValue
SEER22.0
Linear MethodEER = 22 × 0.875 = 19.25
Quadratic MethodEER = −0.02·22² + 1.12·22 − 0.5 = 15.66
1Quadratic: EER = −0.02×(484) + 24.64 − 0.5 = −9.68 + 24.14 = 15.66
2Linear: EER = 22 × 0.875 = 19.25
3Difference: The quadratic is 18.7% lower — more accurate for high SEER units.
Result15.7✓ Quadratic EER = 15.7
Insight: For SEER above ~16, the quadratic formula gives a more realistic EER because the relationship is not linear. The linear method overestimates EER for high‑efficiency units.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming SEER and EER are the same – they are not; SEER is always higher than EER.
  • Using the wrong conversion factor – the 0.875 factor is an approximation; actual conversion depends on the specific unit and test conditions.
  • Forgetting that SEER is a seasonal average, while EER is a fixed-temperature rating.
  • Using the linear formula for all units – the quadratic formula is more accurate for very high SEER units.
  • Not checking the manufacturer's data for the exact EER rating, which is always the most reliable.
  • Confusing units – both are measured in Btu per watt-hour, but the test conditions differ.
  • Applying the conversion backwards (converting EER to SEER with the same factor) – SEER ≈ EER × 1.14, not 0.875.

Applications

  • Compare air conditioner efficiency ratings when shopping for a new unit.
  • Estimate peak-load performance to size cooling systems properly.
  • Understand how seasonal efficiency translates to real-world operation.
  • Evaluate energy savings and operating costs for different AC models.
  • Help HVAC technicians and engineers design efficient cooling systems.
  • Convert SEER ratings from product labels to EER for technical specifications.
  • Make informed decisions about upgrading or replacing existing units.
  • Analyse the trade-off between seasonal efficiency and peak performance.