Home/Aerospace Engineering/Hohmann Transfer First Burn Delta-V

Formula & Calculator

Hohmann Transfer First Burn Delta-V

Velocity change required for the first (perigee) burn of a Hohmann transfer between two circular orbits.

Orbital MechanicsAstrodynamicsPropulsion

Hohmann Transfer — First Burn Δv Calculator

Δv₁ = √(μ/r₁) · (√(2·r₂/(r₁+r₂)) − 1)
Select the variable to solve for, then enter the other three values
Δv₁ μ r₁ r₂
Select body: μ:m³/s²
m/s
m³/s²
m
m

Interpretation

Hohmann transfer first burn Δv1 = √(μ/r₁) · (√(2r₂/(r₁+r₂)) − 1). It is the velocity increment required to leave a circular orbit and enter an elliptical transfer orbit. Example: Earth to Mars (r₁=1 AU, r₂=1.524 AU) → Δv1 ≈ 2.94 km/s.

Δv1 = sqrt(μ/r1) * (sqrt(2*r2/(r1+r2)) - 1)
Hohmann Transfer First Burn Delta-V

Variables

SymbolQuantityUnit
Δv1First burn delta-vm/s
μStandard gravitational parameterm3/s2
r1Initial orbit radiusm
r2Final orbit radiusm

What it means

The Hohmann transfer is the most fuel‑efficient method for transferring between two circular orbits around a central body. The first burn (Δv1) is applied at the initial orbit to raise the apocenter to the target radius. The formula is derived from the vis‑viva equation. Δv1 is the difference between the transfer orbit velocity at the inner radius and the circular velocity. This burn is typically performed at the initial orbit. The total Δv for the transfer includes a second burn at the target orbit to circularise. The Hohmann transfer is used for interplanetary missions, satellite repositioning, and rendezvous. Understanding Δv1 is essential for calculating propellant requirements and mission timing. The formula assumes coplanar orbits and no gravitational assists.

Worked example

Hohmann Transfer First Burn – Two Examples

Real‑World
Scenario: Transfer from LEO (r₁ = 6.678×10⁶ m) to GEO (r₂ = 4.216×10⁷ m). Find first burn Δv (μ = 3.986×10¹⁴).
ParameterValue
r₁6.678×10⁶ m
r₂4.216×10⁷ m
1Δv₁ = √(μ/r₁) × (√(2r₂/(r₁+r₂)) - 1) = √(3.986e14/6.678e6) × (√(2×4.216e7/(6.678e6+4.216e7)) - 1) = 7726 × (√(1.742) - 1) = 7726 × (1.320 - 1) = 7726 × 0.320 = 2472 m/s
Result 2,472 m/s ✓ LEO→GEO
Scenario: r₁ = 6.6×10⁶, r₂ = 2.0×10⁷. Find first burn.
ParameterValue
r₁6.6×10⁶
r₂2.0×10⁷
1Δv₁ = √(3.986e14/6.6e6) × (√(4e7/2.66e7) - 1) = 7772 × (√1.504 - 1) = 7772 × (1.226 - 1) = 1756 m/s
Result 1,756 m/s ✓ Lower
Key insight: First burn raises the orbit from circular to elliptical transfer orbit.

Common mistakes

  • Hohmann transfer first burn Δv: Δv₁ = √(μ/r₁) · (√(2r₂/(r₁+r₂)) − 1).
  • Gravitational parameter μ: For Earth, μ = 3.986×10¹⁴ m³/s².
  • Radii r₁, r₂: From the centre of the central body – absolute (not altitude).
  • Units: r in m, μ in m³/s² → Δv in m/s.
  • Assumes coplanar, circular orbits.

Applications

The first burn delta‑V for a Hohmann transfer, Δv₁ = √(μ/r₁)·(√(2r₂/(r₁+r₂)) − 1), is used to transfer a spacecraft from a lower circular orbit to a higher one. This elliptical transfer is the most fuel‑efficient two‑impulse manoeuvre between coplanar circular orbits. Engineers use this formula to plan interplanetary trajectories, to design satellite orbit‑raising manoeuvres, and to compute Δv budgets. It is essential for mission design, as it allows spacecraft to reach geostationary orbit or other destinations. By applying Hohmann transfer calculations, aerospace engineers can determine the required propellant and engine performance for space missions, balancing efficiency with mission time.

  • Geostationary orbit (GEO) insertion from low Earth orbit
  • Interplanetary trajectory design (e.g., Mars transfers)
  • Satellite orbit raising and deployment
  • Mission delta‑v budget calculation
  • Optimisation of transfer times and fuel consumption

Frequently Asked Questions

Q01What is the Hohmann Transfer First Burn Delta‑V used for?
A01

It calculates the impulsive velocity change required at the perigee of the transfer ellipse to move from a lower circular orbit (radius r1) to a higher circular orbit (radius r2) via a Hohmann transfer.

Q02What do the variables μ, r1, and r2 represent?
A02

μ = gravitational parameter of the central body (e.g., 3.986×10¹⁴ m³/s² for Earth)
r1 = radius of initial circular orbit (m)
r2 = radius of final circular orbit (m)

Q03Why is the Hohmann transfer the most efficient?
A03

For a given pair of circular orbits, the Hohmann transfer (a half‑ellipse) requires the minimum total Δv because it is a two‑impulse transfer that uses the least propellant.

Q04How does the first burn work?
A04

The first burn is applied in the direction of motion to increase the spacecraft’s speed from the circular velocity to the perigee velocity of the transfer ellipse.

Q05What are common mistakes when using this formula?
A05

  • Mixing up r1 and r2 order (transfer up vs down changes the sign convention).
  • Using orbital altitude instead of radius from the Earth’s centre (must add planetary radius).
  • Forgetting that the transfer ellipse perigee is at r1 and apogee at r2.

Q06Give a worked example.
A06

Transfer from LEO (r1 = 6,378 km + 300 km = 6,678 km) to GEO (r2 = 42,164 km). μ = 3.986×10¹⁴. Compute vc1 = √(μ/r1) = √(3.986e14/6.678e6) ≈ 7723 m/s. Then Δv1 = √(μ/r1)·(√(2r2/(r1+r2)) − 1). Calculate √(2×42164/(6678+42164)) = √(84328/48842) = √1.726 = 1.314. Δv1 = 7723×(1.314−1) ≈ 7723×0.314 = 2425 m/s.

Q07What is the second burn Delta‑V?
A07

The second burn occurs at apogee to raise the perigee and circularise the orbit. It is given by Δv2 = √(μ/r2)·(1 − √(2r1/(r1+r2))).

Q08How does the total Δv compare to a direct ascent?
A08

A Hohmann transfer is the minimum two‑impulse transfer. A direct ascent (one burn) is not possible between circular orbits; the Hohmann transfer is the most fuel‑efficient.

Q09What is the time of flight for a Hohmann transfer?
A09

The transfer time is half the period of the transfer ellipse: t = π·√(a3/μ), where a = (r1+r2)/2.

Q10What are the limitations of the Hohmann transfer?
A10

It assumes coplanar orbits (same inclination) and is only optimal for circular orbits. For high eccentricity or non‑coplanar orbits, other transfers (e.g., bi‑elliptic) may be more efficient.