Formula & Calculator
Landing Ground Roll Distance (Simplified)
Simplified estimate of the ground-roll distance required to stop after touchdown, based on aerodynamic and braking drag.
Interpretation
Landing ground roll distance: s_L ≈ 1.69·W²/(g·ρ·S·C_Lmax·D_avg), where D_avg is average drag during braking. It estimates the distance to stop after touchdown. Example: W=20,000 N, ρ=1.225, S=20, C_Lmax=1.5, D_avg=2000 N → s_L ≈ 1.69×400e6/(9.81×1.225×20×1.5×2000) ≈ 676e6/(720,000) ≈ 939 m.
Variables
| Symbol | Quantity | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| s_L | Landing ground roll distance | m |
| W | Weight | N |
| g | Gravitational acceleration | m/s2 |
| ρ | Air density | kg/m3 |
| S | Wing area | m2 |
| C_Lmax | Maximum lift coefficient | |
| D_avg | Average deceleration force | N |
What it means
The landing ground roll is the distance required to decelerate from touchdown speed to a stop. The formula assumes a constant deceleration force (braking + drag) and uses a factor of 1.69 (derived from energy considerations). It depends on landing weight, density, wing area, C_Lmax (which determines touchdown speed), and average drag (including braking). This estimate is used for field length certification and for design of braking systems. Understanding this relation is essential for ensuring safe landing performance.
Worked example
Landing Ground Roll – Two Examples
Real‑World| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| W | 75,000 N |
| S | 20 m² |
| C_Lmax | 2.0 |
| D_avg | 30,000 N |
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| W | 140,000 |
| S | 30 |
| C_Lmax | 2.2 |
| D_avg | 50,000 |
Common mistakes
- Landing ground roll distance (simplified): s_L ≈ 1.69 · W² / (g·ρ·S·C_Lmax·D_avg).
- D_avg: Average drag during landing (including braking).
- 1.69 factor accounts for deceleration.
- Assumes no reverse thrust.
- Braking effectiveness affects D_avg.
Applications
Landing ground roll distance, s_L ≈ 1.69·W²/(g·ρ·S·C_Lmax·D_avg), estimates the distance needed to stop after touchdown. This is essential for airfield design and for ensuring safe landing performance. The factor 1.69 accounts for the average deceleration during braking. Engineers use this to design braking systems, to evaluate landing gear performance, and to set approach speeds. By reducing landing distance through aerodynamic braking (spoilers) and efficient brakes, aerospace engineers can improve safety and enable operation on shorter runways.
- Landing field length and certification analysis
- Braking system design (wheel brakes, thrust reversers)
- Landing gear and tire wear analysis
- Spoiler and lift‑dump design for deceleration
- Airfield compatibility and operational planning
Frequently Asked Questions
It is a simplified estimate of the ground‑roll distance required to stop after touchdown, based on aerodynamic and braking drag. It is used for runway length design.
W = aircraft weight (N)
g = gravity (m/s²)
ρ = air density (kg/m³)
S = wing area (m²)
CLmax = maximum lift coefficient (with flaps)
Davg = average drag during landing (N) – includes aerodynamic and braking drag.
It determines the required landing distance, which is often a limiting factor for airport operations.
It assumes a constant deceleration, no thrust reversal, and that the landing speed is 1.3 times the stall speed. It also assumes a constant average drag.
- Neglecting reverse thrust and spoiler effects, which substantially shorten real‑world landing distance versus wheel‑brake‑only estimates.
- Using the wrong CLmax (e.g., without flaps).
- Ignoring the effect of runway condition (wet, icy).
W = 150,000 N, g = 9.81, ρ = 1.225, S = 50 m², CLmax = 2.0 (with flaps), Davg = 30,000 N. sL ≈ 1.69 × 150000² / (9.81 × 1.225 × 50 × 2.0 × 30000) = 1.69 × 2.25e10 / (9.81 × 1.225 × 3,000,000) = 3.8025e10 / (9.81 × 3.675e6) = 3.8025e10 / 36.05e6 ≈ 1055 m.
At higher altitude, ρ decreases, so the landing distance increases (since sL ∝ 1/ρ).
Spoilers increase drag (Davg) and reduce lift (effectively reducing CLmax for braking), shortening the distance.
Reverse thrust adds to the deceleration, effectively increasing Davg. The formula would need to be modified to include it.
The distance is proportional to the square of the landing speed, so a lower landing speed reduces the distance significantly.