Home/Aerospace Engineering/Aerodynamics/Turbulent Flat Plate Skin Friction Coefficient

Formula & Calculator

Turbulent Flat Plate Skin Friction Coefficient

Empirical local skin-friction coefficient for turbulent boundary-layer flow over a flat plate.

AerodynamicsBoundary LayerFluid Mechanics

Skin Friction Coefficient Calculator Cf = 0.074 / Rex1/5

Cf = 0.074 / Rex0.2
Cf = skin friction coefficient  ·  Rex = Reynolds number (based on length)
⟹ Solve Cf, Rex
Please fix the errors above.
Solve for:
Presets:
Skin Friction Coefficient
Rex: Cf:
✓ Copied!
Cf Gauge
Low (< 0.002) Moderate (0.002–0.006) High (> 0.006)
Cf = 0.074 / Rex1/5  ·  Valid for turbulent flow over a flat plate (Rex > 5×105).

Interpretation

Turbulent flat plate skin friction coefficient: C_f = 0.074 / Re_x^(1/5), for fully turbulent flow (Re > 5e5). Example: Re_x=1e7 → C_f = 0.074 / 10^(1.4) = 0.074/25.12 ≈ 0.00295.

C_f = 0.074 / Re_x^(1/5)
Turbulent Flat Plate Skin Friction Coefficient

Variables

SymbolQuantityUnit
C_fSkin friction coefficient
Re_xLocal Reynolds number

What it means

This empirical correlation gives the local skin friction coefficient for a turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate, derived from the 1/7‑power law velocity profile. It is valid for smooth surfaces and for Re_x up to about 10⁷. The coefficient decreases slowly with Re_x, reflecting the fuller velocity profile and higher mixing. This formula is used to estimate turbulent skin friction drag, which is often the dominant component for aircraft and ships. It is also used in performance calculations and in drag polar construction. Understanding this relation is important for aerodynamic drag estimation and for design optimisation.

Worked example

Turbulent Skin Friction – Two Examples

Real‑World
Scenario: Re_x = 1×10⁶. Find turbulent skin friction coefficient.
ParameterValue
Re_x1×10⁶
1C_f = 0.074/Re_x^(1/5) = 0.074/10^(6/5) = 0.074/15.85 = 0.004669
Result 0.00467 ✓ Turbulent
Scenario: Re_x = 1×10⁷. Find C_f.
ParameterValue
Re_x1×10⁷
1C_f = 0.074/10^(7/5) = 0.074/25.12 = 0.002946
Result 0.00295 ✓ Lower
Key insight: Turbulent skin friction is higher than laminar for the same Re, but decreases with increasing Re.

Common mistakes

  • Turbulent flat plate skin friction coefficient: C_f = 0.074 / Re_x^(1/5).
  • Re_x: Local Reynolds number.
  • Valid for turbulent flow over a smooth flat plate.
  • Applicable for Re_x up to ~10⁷.
  • Exponent is 1/5 (or sometimes 1/6 for other correlations).

Applications

The turbulent flat plate skin friction coefficient, C_f = 0.074/Re_x^(1/5) (approximate, often used for smooth turbulent flow), is used to estimate turbulent friction drag. Turbulent flow is typical for most aircraft, except for small laminar‑flow regions. Engineers use this to compute drag for cruise and climb conditions, and to evaluate the effect of surface roughness. The exponent 1/5 is based on the 1/7 power law for velocity profile. By using this correlation, aerospace engineers can quickly estimate turbulent friction drag and assess the impact of design changes on overall drag and performance.

  • Drag estimation for commercial and military aircraft
  • Performance analysis at high Reynolds numbers
  • Surface roughness and wing design trade‑offs
  • Wind tunnel correlation and flight test validation
  • Preliminary design of turbulent boundary layer profiles

Frequently Asked Questions

Q01What is the Turbulent Flat Plate Skin Friction Coefficient used for?
A01

It is an empirical correlation for the local skin‑friction coefficient of a turbulent boundary layer over a flat plate. It is used to estimate turbulent drag.

Q02What do the variables Cf and Rex represent?
A02

Cf = local skin‑friction coefficient
Rex = Reynolds number based on distance x

Q03Why is the turbulent skin friction coefficient larger than laminar?
A03

Turbulent mixing transfers momentum more effectively, resulting in higher velocity gradients near the wall and thus higher shear stress.

Q04What are the limitations of the 1/5‑power law?
A04

It is valid for smooth plates with Rex between about 5×10⁵ and 10⁷. For higher Re, more refined formulas (e.g., Schlichting or Prandtl’s 1/7 power) are better.

Q05What are common mistakes when applying this formula?
A05

  • Using the 1/5‑power turbulent formula for Reynolds numbers above ~10⁷, where more refined (Schlichting) formulas are needed.
  • Applying it to rough surfaces without correction.
  • Confusing local and average values.

Q06Give a worked example.
A06

At x = 1 m, Rex = 10⁷. Cf = 0.074 / (10⁷)^(1/5) = 0.074 / 10^(1.4) = 0.074 / 25.12 ≈ 0.00295.

Q07How does the turbulent coefficient vary with Reynolds number?
A07

It decreases as Rex^(−1/5), which is a slower decrease than laminar (Re−1/2), so turbulent drag is relatively higher at high Re.

Q08What is the effect of surface roughness on Cf?
A08

Roughness increases the turbulent skin friction, especially at lower Reynolds numbers. The formula is for smooth surfaces.

Q09How do you compute the average skin friction for a turbulent plate?
A09

The average Cf for a fully turbulent plate is given by 0.074/ReL^(1/5) for the entire length, assuming transition at the leading edge.

Q10What is the Schlichting formula?
A10

For a wider Re range, Schlichting proposed Cf = 0.455 / (log10 Rex)2.58, which is more accurate for high Re.